Hubbub has gone into hibernation.

Looking back on a serious symposium

Last week the KNAW (Royal Dutch Academy of Science) organized a symposium on serious games. Something we’re dealing with a lot right now, so we checked it out. Here’s some thoughts on what was talked about:

David Shaffer was the first speaker. He made an interesting point: In order to learn by playing, the player needs a certain feedback loop where he reflects on his actions. Sounds logical, doesn’t come naturally.

It was interesting to see other people’s views on the subject. When designing “Regulator Rally” (a game on assumptions) we thought of ways to get the feedback loop, the reflection on action, in there. The thing is, the example David showed was about teaching people urban planning. For this, they used a multi-player SimCity-like game where all the information was brought in a more fun way than usual. That’s where we, with what we’re doing, tend to take a different approach. Not use ‘a fun way of urban planning’ to teach someone ‘urban planning’, but ‘a fun way of playing’ that, as an effect within the playing person’s head, brings insights in urban knowledge.

After the speakers there was also a discussion panel of some very interesting people that all shared their thoughts on the use of serious games for social change. One of the panel members was Pieter Winsemius. He talked about solving traffic problems by turning traffic jams into a game: Switch lanes? Pay five euros! He also mentioned roundabouts as what he thought could be seen as ‘serious games’ in real life. It was fun to see how someone who’s not into game-design could see the use of gaming in such a clear yet applied manner. Good perspective there!

Why roundabouts work Roundabouts and its rules: serious gaming?

All in all, this was a perfect way to spend an afternoon. We learned some things and gained some brainfood.

This entry was posted in Articles and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.


  1. Iskander Smit
    Posted November 1, 2010 at 03:31 | Permalink

    Nice notes on the symposium I also did attend. I agree the focus was a bit too much on the game and not on the effect of play. See my notes here (in Dutch)

    Besides Pieter Winsemius is a smart man of course, he maybe also benefits of not being biased by the world of games where game designers – serious or not – live in? ;-)

  2. Posted November 3, 2010 at 11:46 | Permalink

    Thanks, read your notes as well, nice view. I guess all we can do is make sure there’s enough play to talk about in the future when it comes to serious / applied games ;)

    About Pieter – spot on!