-
You are reading the Hubbub blog. We write about work we've done and (occasionally) things we find interesting. A feed is also available.
Similar posts
Featured posts
- Engaging sleep mode
- Shifting from Gamification to Playful Design
- ‘Playful Design for Activism’ at E‑Motive Day 2015
- New Planning Methods
- Procedural Instruments Enable Powerful Ways of Making and Seeing Playable Systems
- Designing Playful Museum Exhibitions
- Three Perspectives on Serious Games
- Five Behaviour Design Principles You Never Suspected Would Work
- Video of our Playing with Rules workshop at Mozilla Festival 2013
-
Recent posts
Archives
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
“The opposite of play isn’t work…”
RANJ created a game that makes work in flower farming greenhouses more fun. The game plugs into the data being gathered there already, allowing workers to train their skills at spotting sick plants. In addition, they attempted to increase social interaction between Dutch and Polish workers by asking them to collectively answer a quiz or giving them a karaoke challenge. In a TEDxRotterdam talk, Marcus Vlaar of RANJ points out dull work shouldn’t be dressed up with a game. When attempting to make work more fun, the game should change the actual work itself.
I’ve been thinking about the relationship between work and play and boredom a lot lately.
Partly this is because Maguro, the project that has taken up much of our time at the studio the past months, is an game that runs within a government organization. Similar to RANJ’s greenhouse game, it is aimed at developing employee skills. But we weren’t asked to make their day-to-day tasks more fun. We did however decide early on to mix gameplay with work, and in so doing we were looking to create some kind of friction between the experience of work in daily life, and the work they were asked to do in the game. Our hope was that this might inspire them to change things about their work environment, so they would have as much fun in their play-work as in their real-work.
Children playing at working in a Coca-Cola factory in KidZania
When people are bored at work, should designers feel good when they can come in and make that same task more fun through the addition of game-like feedback loops etc. Or should we feel responsible to help them make their work truly more fulfilling, by changing the very nature of it? Is there a difference? In the most extreme case, should such a game inspire them to switch jobs?
In a fascinating book on work – which I intend to read soon – there is the following Bertrand Russell quote: “the dullest work is… less painful than idleness.” The goal, I think, might not be to make work more fun. But in stead, to give workers the capacity to transform whatever work they’re doing in such a way that it becomes more fulfilling to them.
And the quote in this post’s title? That’s from Brian Sutton-Smith. In full, it reads: “The opposite of play isn’t work, it’s depression.”