-
You are reading the Hubbub blog. We write about work we've done and (occasionally) things we find interesting. A feed is also available.
Similar posts
Featured posts
- Engaging sleep mode
- Shifting from Gamification to Playful Design
- ‘Playful Design for Activism’ at E‑Motive Day 2015
- New Planning Methods
- Procedural Instruments Enable Powerful Ways of Making and Seeing Playable Systems
- Designing Playful Museum Exhibitions
- Three Perspectives on Serious Games
- Five Behaviour Design Principles You Never Suspected Would Work
- Video of our Playing with Rules workshop at Mozilla Festival 2013
-
Recent posts
Archives
- March 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
Week 215
Last week was pretty busy.
The first few days were taken up by our first intermittent delivery for SANMA. I put together our ideas in a slide deck mainly made up of scans of sketches and photos of whiteboards. A lot of this was aimed to provoke more than to solve. We went through the deck with the client in a Skype conference. Some parts we’d come up with were pretty much spot on and ready for elaboration. Other parts were way off mark, but that’s OK: by being unambiguously so, we had some really useful discussion about an alternative direction. Provocation leading to clarity. Good. We wrote the main points from the call up in a debrief, shared that with the client and are now ready to start the second pass.
We also iterated once more on Beestenbende. These are some final adjustments to the current version, which runs on iPods/iPhones. After delivering this, we’re going to switch to a big overhaul targeting the iPad Mini. We feel this device hits the sweet spot in terms of portability and shareability. Beestenbende is played by families using one device. The iPad are too bulky to walk around with for prolonged periods of time, but the iPod’s screen is just too small for a group of much more than three persons to see. The iPad Mini seems to offer a good compromise between the two.
On Tuesday we took a few hours to review how the company is doing using the OKRs we’d set for the third quarter. OKRs (objectives and key results) are a method allegedly in use over at Google and this was the first time we reviewed them. It was fun scoring each, being harsh with ourselves and seeing where we were doing well and where we needed to step up our game. A side-effect I had not anticipated was that it made apparent which part of the company we have more or less instant insight into, and which parts are a bit opaque. Having reviewed our OKRs we set new ones for the final quarter of the year and broke them down into tasks in Asana. I look forward to seeing how we perform at the next review.
All of this happened and also quite a few sales calls, meetings with collaborators, writing of proposals, etc. Like I said: busy!